Brilliant. And a suspicious number of them could have experience working backstage in a theatre.
BruhWaitWut
- 0 Posts
- 10 Comments
BruhWaitWut@lemmy.zipto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Do you think homeless people are responsible for the situation they are in?
1·10 days agoI never gaslit you. You’re just using buzzwords now. This conversation is done. Bye bye hun, grow a frontal lobe
BruhWaitWut@lemmy.zipto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Do you think homeless people are responsible for the situation they are in?
1·10 days agoReread the first paragraph hun, that’s all that still applies. And contains everything I want to say to you. Bye bye
BruhWaitWut@lemmy.zipto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Do you think homeless people are responsible for the situation they are in?
1·10 days agoso I was right in my other comment, you’re just a dick. Thanks for confirming.
BruhWaitWut@lemmy.zipto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Do you think homeless people are responsible for the situation they are in?
5·10 days agoRemoved by mod
BruhWaitWut@lemmy.zipto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Do you think homeless people are responsible for the situation they are in?
2·10 days agoYou aren’t Captain America,standing up for some ideal when the world is against you. The fact that you even consider immoral options as valid shows your intention was never to grow your understanding. You aren’t pointing out some broader social issues like a prophet on a soapbox.
Honestly, you’re showing a lot of signs of being on the autism spectrum. Missing obvious social rules and cues, a rigid sense of morality, and defensiveness at perceived passive aggression. I’ve delt with similar, so this is intended as an olive branch.
The best thing you can do is change or rephrase your question. For example, you could say “How does one end up homeless? Surely there are ways to avoid it, right?” This phrasing leaves the door open for further nuance in responses. Your current phrasing implies responsibility is a simple binary, it’s their fault or it isn’t. The issue, and conversation, isn’t so simple.
Edit: Spelling
BruhWaitWut@lemmy.zipto
science@lemmy.world•Does the decline of book reading mark the end of rational thinking?English
6·10 days agoPeople freaked out about the increased use of books, aka "codexes” at the time, over scrolls.They believed the information was better processed when uninterrupted by turning pages, and that books could never communicate the same depth of understanding as scrolls.
The medium isn’t the issue. It’s the motives. Steer those in the right direction instead of longing for some golden past that never existed.
I mean yeah? Why the question? Both can be true.
Most Americans recognize things are usually more complicated. It’s our “representatives” that boil away the nuance. And without nuance it’s easy to label any rebel a terrorist, regardless of their actual tactics and intent.



Dude jerks to the left last minute and your buddy loses a finger