Preaching to the choir. The people who need to see this never will.
I’m mostly half-serious.
Preaching to the choir. The people who need to see this never will.
I made this meme a while back. Got downvoted.
These are technical terms. There’s legal protest, then civil disobedience—this is how we ended Jim Crow; a lot of people had to go to jail to fight the system—and then there’s domestic terrorism. If you don’t think civil disobedience is going far enough, then you’re advocating for terrorism.
I’m tired of “being the bigger person”. Four years ago, Trump wouldn’t even admit that he lost the election. They’re hitting below the belt, and we have one hand behind our back.
This is why I agree with Republicans on guns rights. They won’t give up their guns so fuck it, give me one too.
The word you’re looking for is: civil disobedience. Break laws, get attention. Our grandparents did the same thing during Vietnam.
Brave New World
Lemmy mods are the same. Actually, a lot of our mods were literally reddit mods.
Me at American Airports: Why the fuck do I have to take off my belt/shoes and throw away my water? They just let me walk into a crowded airport with this shit…
Top should be German. Stasi vibes
Priorities lmao
Does anyone have this meme template?
Replace “treat” with “whiskey”
What’s really crazy is when you spend a ton of time editing an image because you think the idea is funny and the post goes nowhere. Then you repost some bullshit and it makes front page.
My experience has been the opposite. Lemmings take everything too seriously.
Right. We consider the existence of God to be nonsense, because any god that was omnibenevolent wouldn’t be such a piece of shit, yet here we are in reality. Your premise is faulty.
Yes, you are once again proving my point that you aren’t taking the “starting assumption” (i.e. the existence of a perfect God) seriously. It’s perfectly fine if your conception of God is of a terrible serial killer, I am not trying to convince you otherwise, but now we aren’t talking about the same God.
I think you’ve proven my point as you’re contradicting yourself.
And if God did exist, we think God is a total dick
The Abrahamic conception of God is of an infinitely perfect being who’s attributes–viz., omnipotence, omniscience, omnibenevolence, omnipresence-- are maximally unified in that one being. So to suppose that this God exists but then deny his omnibenevolence is a logical contradiction of the definition of the Abrahamic God. (This is akin to, for example, supposing that a square-circle exists.) If God does exist, but he isn’t omnibenevolent, then this is no longer the Abrahamic God. Which is why I argued that you are not “taking the starting assumption seriously” in my earlier comment.
An eight hour retrospective on Morrowind? Sign me the fuck up