I’m not going to argue with you anymore. Let’s agree to disagree 👍

Thank you so much I’m going to watch it!

Don’t 3D printed guns have normal parts except for the slide and handle which are 3D printed?

Where is this from?

Yes, I agree very much with your statement. I think our lives would be much better if our government was built like an open source project lol

It’s a huge stretch. Most of the people buying these glasses are just interested in technology, see this cool new thing, and are ignorant to privacy because they already use social media and whatnot. Creeps use phones to take underskirt pictures of girls too, so are you going to go around calling every phone owner a creep? People like you who see ignorant “normies” as malicious enemies are what’s wrong with the privacy community. Like I said earlier, we should educate, not name call.

Failed to protect children or failed to aid the UK government in their dystopian authoritarianism?

Keepass DX/XC (mobile/desktop) + syncthing to sync the database file between devices is the best solution out there. You can also put the database file in your cloud to follow the 3-2-1 backup.

Can we not call everyone we don’t like pedophiles? It lowers the impact of the word when it’s used against an actual pedo. It also makes it harder to reason with those people because they just think of you as name callers.

I agree that the more popular opinion is changing to more freedom, but most of the older millennials and above that I talk to care more about catching criminals because they are more likely to be influenced by Facebook/Nextdoor posts and the mainstream media.

Thank you!

PRC? Sorry looking it up didn’t give me a good result.

Sadly some people do want flock cameras because they think it’s worth it to have a better chance of catching criminals even if our personal liberties get taken away. It’s the age old freedom vs safety discussion.

I’m saying that the big corporations have such a strong foothold that I personally don’t think we will ever be able to properly regulate them when they can pay off all of the politicians. I’m not trying to be a doomer, those are just my beliefs.

I agree. I don’t think screen time limits are adequate.

Alright I understand your perspective now and agree.

Then the big companies will just operate under multiple names to commit tax evasion like they already do and pay off the politicians to let them.

You don’t need to know how to use social media to set up the Apple parental controls that put time restrictions on certain apps.

I don’t understand how it correlates. The article isn’t saying that children of parents who use social media are more likely to be addicted to social media, it’s saying that parental controls aren’t helping stop social media addiction in children. So how does that smoker analogy make sense?

That analogy makes no sense for this situation.