What makes you think this doesn’t apply to Mastodon instances?

But they already lost the advantage they had. The point of the retaliatory tariffs are not to make money, but to send a message.

They’ve already sent a message that they can tolerate Trump’s bullshit as long as it doesn’t hurt them too much when they backed down on the digital service tax.

Bringing it back now is a lot less effective than implementing it the first time around while still hurting Canadians the same amount.

Sounds like a good thing, honestly.

That article has a lot of reaching between the proof it claims and its conclusion.

As always, unsafe never means 100% chance to kill. Not wearing s seatbelt while driving is unsafe, but it doesn’t mean that you will not be able to survive to 90 is you’re lucky.

Birds.

Yeah, it does make it racist, but which party is performing the racist act? The AI, the AI trainer, the data collector, or the system that prioritises white patients? That’s the important distinction that simply calling it racist fails to address.

Haha, don’t project your own problems onto me, man.

You’re still confusing the two sentences. Haah, why do I even bother?

Can you not tell the difference between the sentence “blame him for being a man” with “blame all his problems on him being a man”?

True, both are sexist, but they literally mean different things. You’re just proving again how you can’t read.

Try reading from the start again, and maybe you’d finally be able to grasp some form of understanding. Good luck.

How? It’s a meme created by Chinese people to refer to one specific person.

You really can’t read, can you? My comment is simple enough it would take a cock-up of epic proportions to not get my point.

You’re pissy, jaded and uncomfortable with the concept of being wrong. Classic men shit.

Here you go.

Again, so you think the solution to someone that self harms is to blame them for performing the act. You’re a genius, you know that?

Well, you see, only his anecdote has any value, anybody else’s is just an anecdote and therefore doesn’t count.

You seem to lack empathy.

You just blamed all his so-called issues on him being a man. The question is can you read your own comment or do you just type out sentences that you yourself don’t understand?

Ok, so the solution to men feeling too scared to open up about their mental health enough to rely on something as unreliable as ChatGPT is for you to victim blame them?

you’re willing to hop to “human thought is just an advanced chatbot” on scant evidence.

Not what I said, my point is that humans are organic probabilistic thinking machine and LLMs are just an imitation of that. And your assertion that an LLM is never ever gonna be similar to how the brain works is based on what evidence, again?

You want proof of that? Take a look at yourself. Are you a floating brain stem or being with limbs?

At even the most reductive and tech bro-ish, healthy humans are self-fueling, self-healing, autonomous, communicating, feeling, seeing, laughing, dancing, creative organic robots with GI built-in.

Even if a person one day creates a robot with all or most of these capabilities and worthy of considering having rights, we still won’t be the organic version of that robot. We’ll still be human.

What the hell are you even rambling about? Its like you completely ignored my previous comment, since you’re still going on about robots.

Bro, don’t hallucinate an argument I never made, please. I’m only discussing about how the human mind works, yet here you are arguing about human limbs and what it means to be human?

I’m not interested in arguing against someone who’s more interested with inventing ghosts to argue with instead of looking at what I actually said.

And again, go take your own advice and maybe go to therapy or something.