Just came across this case where a California Highway Patrol officer tried to arrest a firefighter in the midst of treating people injured in a traffic incident, simply because he refused to move a fire engine that was blocking a lane of traffic on the highway to protect first responders and the patients they were attending to.

  • flandish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    6 hours ago

    as a firefighter myself, I would have reminded the cop we outrank them (at least in my state) when it comes to this kind of scene safety. Would have prob been arrested because indeed ACAB.

    that cop is a power tripping bastard. all of them are.

    • voracitude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 hours ago

      What kind of recourse would you have in that situation, if the world were still sane? Would your supervisors hash it out, would the judge to look at the case and throw it out, would you even expect it to get all the way to court, etc?

      • BakerBagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 minutes ago

        I imagine what would happen is that the fire chief would go ballistic on the police chief until that officer was fired. That’s probably the best outcome that’s within the realm of possibility

  • _core@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    My favorite firefighter fact is that they will straight up use their trucks to shove cop cars out of the way, and if they get smashed to shot, oh well.

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 hours ago

        i would even argue that by necessity both movements must be connected. the reason at the core of the fuck cars movement is that cars are an unnatural status quo. our cities are designed for cars instead of people because the petrochemical industry makes more money if our cities require us to exist in isolated rolling boxes.

        meanwhile the reason at the core of the acab movement is that cops exist to unnaturally enforce status quos. we could move on and create new ways of existing, but the cops need us to all stay as things are because that’s what serves their masters

        • thanks AV@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          And that’s without mentioning that the majority of police departments time is spent policing traffic violations instead of doing actual work to prevent harm to persons or property. Getting rid of cars is the first thing people should be looking towards in order to defund police departments. Once traffic enforcement is no longer needed the entire department starts looking like a big joke.

  • Carvex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Guess who’s not going to that cops house when the 911 fire call comes in?

    • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The underlying ideology doesn’t depend on state actors. When there were road blockings (because of climate protests) in Germany, motorists sometimes became violent against the cause of the blockade (protesters in this case). Sure, climate protest and emergency response don’t compare, but the motorist ideology is the same.