• lawrence@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Oh no, not again.

      edit: I simply wish to enjoy comics, and I hope others can enjoy them too, without having to do a full background check on the author of the comic, keeping the community simple and nice. This should be like a library of good comics.

      • Vespair@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I understand your desire, but life does not exist in a vacuum. While death of the artist may be easy for you, it is not as simple of an equation for others, especially when said author still lives and benefits monetarily from their creation. And yes, I think we have some culpability even in what we share for free, as keeping them culturally relevant allows their benefits and influence to continue.

        Personally, I was a big Dilbert fan; my parents used to gift me a new Dilbert calendar annually and I subscribed to the Washington Post for years in no small part so I could read the weekly Dilbert strip. So I’ll admit it, I take this particular betrayal a little personally. Finding out that Scott Adams was a racist bag of shit felt like hearing that my favorite uncle was actually an non-convicted rapist.

        For what it’s worth though, I am sorry that Scott Adam’s gross personal abhorrent opinions get in the way of enjoying your silly office humor comic strip, sincerely.

      • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I get not wanting deal with every artist’s hidden history. But Adams is a well known and documented nut. Your comment is like wondering why people are mad at Roman Polanski and why you can’t just “enjoy” his movies. Sure you can, but I’m gonna judge you for it.

        • strawberrysocial@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Do you not watch or enjoy any of the movies that Harvey Weinstein had his name or company attached to? Cuz it’s a shit load of films and stuff you are saying people shouldn’t be allowed to enjoy without being judged for it because that guy was a monster.

          • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            A little different to say Weinstein was as involved in say a Tarantino movie, as Polanski was in a Polanski movie.

            • strawberrysocial@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              How is it different? He profited from it, did he not? Shouldn’t you feel bad or guilty for watching movies he got money from producing or having his name/company attached to, by your own logic?

      • magnusrufus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Not again? Last time was stonetoss. If you are this disconnected maybe do a quick “is this artist a well known bigot” web search before posting from here on.

      • DarkGamer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        His racism and abhorrent views have leaked into his content, there is no separating the art from the artist here.

  • Rolando@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Second panel: (spews various advertisements)

    Third panel: “Unfortunately, he’s already undergone enshittification.” / “I’ve just sold all your personal information!”