Just your normal everyday casual software dev. Nothing to see here.

  • 0 Posts
  • 1.34K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 15th, 2023

help-circle
  • Fully agree. I think that Steam should make it a platform requirement that external launchers cannot be used on the platform.

    It makes zero sense for me to hit play just to have a third party launcher open, and I have to hit play in that third party launcher as well. and I have to hit play in that third party launcher as well. At that point, I’m better off just buying it through the third party launcher.

    The whole third-party launcher update process is also obnoxious… Every gatcha game does it. what’s the point of using steam at that point




  • Even then, the prompt could be as easy as a “recheck” button that the user sees on age restricted media. Kind of like how their age verification bucket was going to be. Database side all they need to know is a boolean of true or false of if they are a minor or not. or /maybe/ a trinary (0,1,2) system if that wanted a distinguishment of < 13 13-17 and 18+ It doesn’t have to check daily, it only has to check when the user requests access to age restricted stuff.



  • I agree with Matrix Sucking, it needs very heavy work on both frontend and backend implementations to be taken serious, that’s why I stopped pushing it to my friend groups, the people I convinced to join ended up needing features it just doesn’t support yet, like an actual permission system instead of the numeric based > x style, or actual custom emote capability that isn’t a patchwork decided by the software and the huge barrier of getting started. People don’t want to have to pick through 30 different frontends to find one that works perfectly for a server.

    Matrix works amazingly for the techies, or for people who want a limited IRC style feature set. But for for the casuals who are used to what discord provides, it just isn’t a good competitor. It’s complicated to get going, isn’t unified and lacks features. Most people I have tried to suggest it have bailed due to that not long after joining.

    XMPP being difficult though? I hard disagree. It’s well maintained, it’s super established, and for the most part unlike matrix whom decided frontend needed to make decisions on feature-sets, everything on XMPP is backend based. You have the same issues as matrix client wise but, for the most part client feature-sets are universal due to how long it’s been out. I would push XMPP long before I go back to pushing matrix again. I have had better luck keeping/maintaining people on XMPP than I have with matrix.


  • Yea this right here. People don’t remember, the only reason everyone left Skype in the first place, wasn’t because of skypes enshittification, although that didn’t help.

    It was because during skypes implementation of said enshittification, their uptime was almost non-existent. Cloud servers crashed constantly, the linux program for it was unusable and required reinstall every time you opened. Messages weren’t sending and people weren’t getting notifications or history. People were forced to go elsewhere in order to remain in contact, so people moved to discord. The more people who moved the faster the transition become. Eventually everyone realized “Wow this is such a better product” and decided to stay.




  • I think a big issue with it is that theres no real way to properly sue a project if the president ok’s it. It’s a lot of money to go after a case, and then since it’s a federal case the president has pardon power on it. An IP violation is almost always federal… which falls under that pardoning ability. It would need to either stay at a state level (which is unlikely given who is involved) or keep it in civil court, which I don’t think IP violations of this magnitude would stay contained.

    Honestly with how the law currently is, I think the president could publicly execute someone(or order someone else to) for any declared reason, as long as said reason could be remotely tied to it’s position of power, and then for the crime they could just pardon it. There’s nothing blocking it.







  • Pika@sh.itjust.workstoGames@sh.itjust.worksSteamDB Joins Nexus Mods
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Nexus mods? you mean the same site that paywalls downloading mods in bulk, and account walls downloading files to require sign in? And has already been proven to remove free features if they think it can be a decent perk for the sub model, the same site that deactivates accounts after a few months of no activity, the one with literal ads in their first party software and the only way to get around it is to pay a monthly subscription. That is the site you plan to keep your “always free, no paywall” product on.

    Yea OK, I love the ambition but I will believe that when I see it. I expect SteamDB will be locked behind a paywall a few years from now at the latest.

    Also if I find it amusing that if you look at the FAQ’s on it… they are straightforward and say they plan to make money off of it.

    edit: Upon looking it up again, I misremembered the third party situation. They rate limit third party, if detected, so I removed that complaint.



  • “unrestricted ownership” of an online multiplayer game.

    I personally don’t see why that would be unreasonable. Yea it’s multiplayer but, you buy a product expecting to be able to use said product, even if it’s multiplayer. I can somewhat understand the argument of breaking online TOS or something and being banned but… I don’t get the argument that you can’t own your games you have. There’s no reason that a storefront in general would do that. Imagine the concept on that applied to any other industry. “Yea so the repo man is here for your couch, yea I know you paid for it in full 12 years ago but, the furniture supplier no longer supports that model so we are removing it”. Most people would expect the same out of their digital products. I’ll be curious to see what direction that goes.