“Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: […] like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.” —Jonathan Swift

  • 66 Posts
  • 1.37K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 25th, 2024

help-circle



  • Those “last two data points” are two months. For OS X, there’s some upward movement the last two months (about 3%, which isn’t a lot given it spiked late last year from 8.3% to 14.07% to 8.2% in a span of three points), while Linux is practically flatlined with a very light upward incline just the last month.

    To the extent StatCounter is useful to begin with, the Linux point is functionally meaningless while the OS X increase of a few percentage points may or may not be significant; trying to divine a trend from twitches in those two points is reading noise. Look at the “unknown” line, meanwhile, and see how it begins mirroring Windows’ decline around mid–late 2025. It rose from 11.3% in September 2025 to 21.5% in June 2026. That represents actual, meaningful, lasting change.







  • Unrelated to the question, but I think the other commentor got it right, so I’ll say this instead. If you’re doing GasBuddy, it would be amazing if you also added data to OpenStreetMap where applicable. We don’t keep track of the current price, because it’s supposed to be semi-static infrastructure, but we do keep track of payment methods accepted and types of fuel offered.

    We keep track of other amenities too like compressed air and vac stations, but just adding the payment, fuel, etc. data to the existing station object would already be above and beyond and so appreciated.

    That said, if not, it’s still cool knowing that you’re also out there helping to crowdsource knowledge.


  • This just reads like a press release from Sun-Ways laundered through Euronews. The title reads “Italy could be the next country” but never mentions Italy a single time in the body of the article. The entire idea seems comically inefficient compared to easier, higher-yield places to put solar panels.

    “Oh, we have to specially design these so they resist cracking and setting on fire, we can’t nearly angle them properly for optimal efficiency, they sit on top of critical infrastructure, and they’re as low to the ground as humanly possible? Perfect!”


    Edit: Whoops. My brain straight-up skipped a paragraph.