Eskating cyclist, gamer and enjoyer of anime. Probably an artist. Also I code sometimes, pretty much just to mod titanfall 2 tho.

Introverted, yet I enjoy discussion to a fault.

  • 46 Posts
  • 862 Comments
Joined 2 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年6月13日

help-circle
  • Certain workloads can’t just magically cause your CPU to get “unusually” hot. It’s true that some instruction sets can cause greater thermal loads than others, but disabling the relevant instruction sets is only likely to make it worse, as the CPU will then complete the work using other less efficient instructions.

    A CPU will run as hot as it needs to to do whatever it is doing, up to whatever its safe temperature is, at which point it will slow down to protect itself. Running at this “max” temp is not a problem. CPUs will run as fast and hot as they safely can, and no hotter.

    Presumably the emulated games are simply framerate and resolution limited, where the normal PC games may not be.

    That said, there are some things you can do, assuming the CPU doesn’t actually need to work as hard as it is to run the games you are playing.

    • Limit framerate. The game may be running uncapped, in which case it will be using 100% GPU (and therefore more CPU as well) to create as many frames as possible. The ones in excess of your display refresh rate will simply not be shown. You can usually limit framerate in game settings (often called vsync). If this isn’t available, it can be done using mangohud.
    • Limit power and/or clock speed. This will lower power consumption and temperatures, at the cost of performance. Which is not a problem if the game doesn’t actually need to run that fast.
    • Lower the “max” allowed temperature. This will cause the CPU to throttle sooner, keeping it cooler. This usually has a severely negative impact on performance.

    You might also look into undervolting the system. This involves lowering the voltage used by the CPU. This can allow it to run cooler without sacrificing performance, but can cause system instability.




  • are we just amusing ourselves until death?

    IMO, yes. But just calling it “entertainment” is a bit reductionist, I think.

    But yeah. And I don’t see anything is wrong with that. Having a cat is cool, video games are fun, and good company is fulfilling in a powerful, indescribable, way.

    To experience that kind of stuff, and for others to do the same, as much and as often as possible, is what I live for.

    Yeah, there’s a lot of bad stuff in the world. But I’m able to make my corner of it quite liveable. And not just for myself, but for friends and family.

    I can’t save the world, but I can decide to make the sliver of it that I’ll interact with throughout my life, a little bit nicer.

    The part I struggle with, is finding a way to make living, that makes things better, not worse. Jobs that don’t contribute towards people having less and less time for the things that make life worth living, are non-existent.





  • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyztoScience Memes@mander.xyzoops
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 天前

    Cool.

    But the reason you’re being downvoted, is that instead of commenting this, you made a comment that sounded like you were dismissing the dangers of PFAS, and dismissing it as the modern-day equivalent to lead, asbestos, and the like.

    Which is what it is, and you clearly agree that it is.



  • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyztoScience Memes@mander.xyzoops
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 天前

    Did you at some point read about how some of them, such as the ones used in frying pans, are unlikely to cause problems in the human body, and then completely stopped looking into it further?

    It’s a massive group of compounds, some of which currently look to be quite safe, but a significant number of which also have fully verified dangers (especially some compounds required for production).