• El Barto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    The avatar is an unnecessary distraction. Can the video be just audio? Use that. Can the video be audio and text? Use that.

    Plus if plaintiffs and defendants can sometimes get away with certain outcomes because of what they look like (this has been studied and observed), imagine criminals using cute little teens that happen to look like the judges’ kids to argue the case.

    I’d say a compromise would be that the avatar be the same for all court cases; chosen by the court system. I’d be sort of okay with this.

    And the whole AI destroying the planet is a topic for another moment.

    • Sizing2673@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      All good points but keep in mind the current system is racist

      So, even if avatars were allowed to happen tomorrow night… You’d still have a “oh no, the system chose a black person for you, good luck…” Unsolved dilemma

      Good food for thought all around

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        That’s why I said that the avatar should be the same for all court cases. Let’s say Microsoft Office Clippy, though it could have been a stick-man or Bob Ross.