• Coco@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    So many examples of this.

    US absolutely torches any progress made in alternative fuels then goes on to claim no possible alternatives to fossil fuels.

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      There’s a law requiring ever-increasing amounts of biofuel to be mixed into everything. Biofuel has a ton of downsides that have great potential for a dust bowl 2.0, but that’s another topic. US researchers have every motivation to develop non-constly alternatives by virtue of investors, even if the investment only gives them a small bubble like Arcimoto’s minicars did. In fact, California is considering using hydrogen cars for parts of their network that don’t go past the speeds hydrogen fuel can support.