• Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 months ago

    Quantum computers won’t displace traditional computers. There’s certain niche use-cases for which quantum computers can become wildly faster in the future. But for most calculations we do today, they’re just unreliable. So, they’ll mostly coexist.

    • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      In other words like GPUs. GPUs suck ass at complex calculations. They however, work great for a large number of easy calculations, which is what is needed for graphics processing.

    • Amanda
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Presumably you’d have a QPU in your regular computer, like with other accelerators for graphics etc, or possibly a tiny one for cryptography integrated in the CPU

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        There would have to be some kind of currently unforseen breakthroughs before something like that would be even remotely possible. In all likelihood, quantum computing would stay in specialized data centers. For the problems quantum would solve, there is really no advantage to having it local anyways.

        • Amanda
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I assume we need a lot of breakthroughs to even have useful quantum computing at all, but sure.

          Isn’t quantum encryption interesting for end users?

          • hades@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            Quantum encryption isn’t something quantum computers can even do. It’s not just transforming bits into other bits, it’s about building entirely new security properties based on physical properties of matter.

            So, even if it is interesting for end users, they would need dedicated hardware anyway.

            • Amanda
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Shows how much I know! (Nothing)