With the implementation of Patch v0.5.5 this week, we must make yet another compromise. From this patch onward, gliding will be performed using a glider rather than with Pals. Pals in the player’s team will still provide passive buffs to gliding, but players will now need to have a glider in their inventory in order to glide.

How lame. Japan needs to fix its patent laws, it’s ridiculous Nintendo owns the simple concept of using an animal to fly.

  • Alaknár@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Chinese companies famously ignore patent law and do make copies and try to flood the western market with them.

    But western companies at least have a tool to fight back or limit the flood.

    Most startups don’t have the time and/or money to patent their ideas and big corps do squash them/steal their ideas routinely once they become noticeable.

    Ah, the usual “if the solution is not absolutely 100% perfect, let’s throw out the solution”. Come on…

    If anything, startups can’t develop their ideas because some company will hold a generic patent like “clicking a button does something” (or “glide with a pet”) from 30 years ago.

    Yeah, this happens all of once every billion times. Clearly the system is stupid and needs to be killed so that nobody who isn’t extremely rich can actually develop anything new without being immediately put out to pasture.

    • Saryn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yes, US companies have a lot of IP conflicts with China and we do tend to hear about them through media. But that paints a skewed picture of what’s actually happening.

      If you were to research it more carefully, you would find out that the vast majority of these claims (>90%) are not pursued by US companies. As a deliberate, strategic decision. They don’t want to.

      Ask yourself why.

      Don’t believe me? Google is your friend.

      • Alaknár@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I don’t care where the company making the claim is from, as long as it acquired the IP legally and has a valid claim for protecting it.

        The way the patent system works is bad in many, many, MANY ways, but saying “copyright and patent laws need to die” is just idiotic. As it is, we at least have a semblance of rules. Without it, it’s just “whoever can reproduce and mass produce a promising product faster”. And that means: China because they already make everything.

    • TronBronson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I just wanna know which amazing video game innovations We are protecting here in America. Are we talking about the failing franchises that have been milking their customers for 15 years? Have we done anything really innovative recently? Remakes delayed games and flops.

      • Alaknár@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I just wanna know which amazing video game innovations We are protecting here in America

        First, I’m not talking specifically about America. Second, I’m not talking about “amazing innovations”. Copyright is also for trademarks, very characteristic gameplay mechanics, etc. For example, Playrix made “Fishdom” which was copy-paste Worms. Team17 won the case and protected their IP.

        Are we talking about the failing franchises that have been milking their customers for 15 years?

        Umm… No? What does that have to do with copyright or IP protection…?

        Have we done anything really innovative recently?

        Have you tried looking at titles from other publishers than Ubisoft, EA or Activition?