you’ve not shared any established facts, you’ve regurgitated luddite bollocks, so I don’t really think that’s a valid response. But you know that, d0on’t you?
Prove it. I’m sure you can find some reputable sources to bank your claims.
luddite
Maybe you ought to also better understand that comparing one to people who stood up against exploitation isn’t really an insult. Just like the Rednecks were those fighting for the working class when they were gunned down by rent-a-cops with machine guns at Blair Mountain.
What luddies were or were not is not really relevant to the fact that the term now means someone opposed to new technology for spurious reasons, which describes you perfectly
TIL: Accelerating global climate change, increasing depletion of available reserved of potable water through use of open-loop cooling, intentionally eroding the ability of people to support themselves by using their own works to compete with them without license or consent to do so, and passing all economic gains upwards, with no financial benefit realized by people doing the actual work is “spurious”.
Your claim is that “everything” that I previously stated was factually incorrect and have provided exactly nothing but ad hominem attacks to “prove” your point. So, are you going to backup your claims at all, or are you just approaching this in bad faith to troll or reinforce your pseudo-religious faith in LLMs (which will never be sentient nor save us from the problems that they are contributing to).
Yeah those things are either not happening or your ire is directed at the wrong place because you want to blame the new thing for existing problems. Generative AI is a tool, nothing more. A knife can be used to cook dinner or stab people but you’re not dead-set against knives because they’re older than you and therefore fine
Feel like supporting this statement?
Not really.You know you’re repeating nonsense
If you’ve any shed of evidence to disprove established fact, please share it. Otherwise, jog on, mate.
you’ve not shared any established facts, you’ve regurgitated luddite bollocks, so I don’t really think that’s a valid response. But you know that, d0on’t you?
Prove it. I’m sure you can find some reputable sources to bank your claims.
Maybe you ought to also better understand that comparing one to people who stood up against exploitation isn’t really an insult. Just like the Rednecks were those fighting for the working class when they were gunned down by rent-a-cops with machine guns at Blair Mountain.
What luddies were or were not is not really relevant to the fact that the term now means someone opposed to new technology for spurious reasons, which describes you perfectly
TIL: Accelerating global climate change, increasing depletion of available reserved of potable water through use of open-loop cooling, intentionally eroding the ability of people to support themselves by using their own works to compete with them without license or consent to do so, and passing all economic gains upwards, with no financial benefit realized by people doing the actual work is “spurious”.
Your claim is that “everything” that I previously stated was factually incorrect and have provided exactly nothing but ad hominem attacks to “prove” your point. So, are you going to backup your claims at all, or are you just approaching this in bad faith to troll or reinforce your pseudo-religious faith in LLMs (which will never be sentient nor save us from the problems that they are contributing to).
Yeah those things are either not happening or your ire is directed at the wrong place because you want to blame the new thing for existing problems. Generative AI is a tool, nothing more. A knife can be used to cook dinner or stab people but you’re not dead-set against knives because they’re older than you and therefore fine