fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agoCursedmander.xyzexternal-linkmessage-square94fedilinkarrow-up1787arrow-down19
arrow-up1778arrow-down1external-linkCursedmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square94fedilink
minus-squareDrew@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·1 day agoProof via “just look at it”
minus-squareBlueFootedPetey@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·12 hours agoI feel like the pixalation on the rotated squares is enough to say this picture is not proof. Again I am not saying they are wrong, just that it would be extremely easy make a picture where it looks like all the squares are all the same size.
minus-squareDrew@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 hours agoI was joking about the proof but there’s a non-pixelated version in the comments here
minus-squareCheeseNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 day agoVisual proofs can be deceptive, e.g. the infinite chocolate bar.
Proof via “just look at it”
I feel like the pixalation on the rotated squares is enough to say this picture is not proof.
Again I am not saying they are wrong, just that it would be extremely easy make a picture where it looks like all the squares are all the same size.
I was joking about the proof but there’s a non-pixelated version in the comments here
Visual proofs can be deceptive, e.g. the infinite chocolate bar.