• SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Yep I had that backwards in my head. Could this actually end up not being terrible? Don’t wanna give him any credit but I’m not read up on economics.

    • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’m not much of a doomer on the tarriffs. The US is already pretty self sufficient, more so then a lot of other developed nations, i think trade is around 17% of the economy, whereas in a lot of other countries it’s more like 30%. We make most of our own necessities here like food, gas etc.

      Vietnam is mostly making cheap clothes, shoes and electronics and I don’t think the world’s gonna end if those cost 20% more. I’m more of the mind that the world’s going to end if we keep making more fast fashion and e waste but thats a different subject. It could cause larger appliances and vehicles downstream of the electronics to also cost more which are more on the necessity side.

      Even if it may be better for the planet it’s still not gonna be good for the economy. UPS just announced 20,000 people are getting layed off because Amazon is expecting lower orders due to tarriffs.

      I don’t think this is going to be made up for by American industry. People were buying $20 pants because they are $20, if it costs $50 to make them in America then people just won’t buy them. We also probably won’t increase exports much because American labor costs, especially after these deportation, are too high to compete

      So at best, assuming this is the deal that the rest of the developing world will get, this will slow down the US economy and probably stall it, sort of where we’re at right now. At worst it will cause a slight contraction.