Seriousely how many of you do that? Sincearly a european

  • Curious Canid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 天前

    I live in the US and I heat my tea water in an electric kettle. It probably isn’t as fast as yours, but it is still close to microwave speed. And I can heat up enough for several cups of tea and have it keep the rest hot. I usually drink more than one at a sitting.

    • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 天前

      Unless I’m misunderstanding your statement, you’re saying it’s faster to boil water in the microwave than the kettle? How’s that possible? I would think the microwave has more wasted energy

      • Curious Canid@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 天前

        My microwave can boil a single cup of water faster than my kettle. My kettle can boil four cups of water a lot faster than my microwave. It all depends on the microwave and kettle (and the voltage available).

      • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 天前

        Microwave is blasting radiation at 100% efficiency as soon as you turn it on. Kettles heating elements need to heat up before they can heat the water.

        • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 天前

          I wonder what the efficiency of absorption is, though. Does 100% of emitted radiation get soaked up by the cup, or does some escape into the surroundings?

          • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 天前

            It doesn’t get absorbed so much as excite the water particles as it passes through. I’d imagine it would be more effective in the beginning when they’re standing relatively still.