• TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    that is such a ridiculous idea. Just because you see hate for it in the media doesn’t mean it originated there. I’ll have you know that i have embarrassed myself by screaming at robot phone receptionists for years now. stupid fuckers pretending to be people but not knowing shit. I was born ready to hate LLMs and I’m not gonna have you claim that CNN made me do it.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Search AI in Lemmy and check out every article on it. It definitely is media spreading all the hate. And like this article is often some money yellow journalism

      • TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        all that proves is that lemmy users post those articles. you’re skirting around psychotic territory here, seeing patterns where there are none, reading between the lines to find the cover-up that you are already certain is there, with nothing to convince you otherwise.

        if you want to be objective and rigorous about it, you’d have to start with looking at all media publications and comparing their relative bias.

        then you’d have to consider their reasons for bias, because it could just be that things actually suck. (in other words, if only 90% of media reports that something sucks when 99% of humanity agrees it sucks, maybe that 90% is actually too low, not too high)

        this is all way more complicated than media brainwashing.

      • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I think it’s lemmy users. I see a lot more LLM skepticism here than in the news feeds.

        In my experience, LLMs are like the laziest, shittiest know-nothing bozo forced to complete a task with zero attention to detail and zero care about whether it’s crap, just doing enough to sound convincing.

        • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          😆 I can’t believe how absolutely silly a lot of you sound with this.

          LLM is a tool. It’s output is dependent on the input. If that’s the quality of answer you’re getting, then it’s a user error. I guarantee you that LLM answers for many problems are definitely adequate.

          It’s like if a carpenter said the cabinets turned out shit because his hammer only produces crap.

          Also another person commented that seen the pattern you also see means we’re psychotic.

          All I’m trying to suggest is Lemmy is getting seriously manipulated by the media attitude towards LLMs and these comments I feel really highlight that.

          • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            If that’s the quality of answer you’re getting, then it’s a user error

            No, I know the data I gave it and I know how hard I tried to get it to use it truthfully.

            You have an irrational and wildly inaccurate belief in the infallibility of LLMs.

            You’re also denying the evidence of my own experience. What on earth made you think I would believe you over what I saw with my own eyes?