• observes_depths@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    4 days ago

    I think there was at least one case where the city went broke maintaining roads and everyone left. That was a success.

      • JayleneSlide@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        My back was to put in rail everywhere with zero roads. People constantly complained about wanting roads, but there was never any congestion. And the desire for roads never seemed to affect anything.

    • DrDeadCrash@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Having been on a small town board, the truth is roads are funded at the state level (may vary by state) with funds distributed to the county governments, who maintain the county highways. The towns and cities get some amount from the county and more from the state to be used for anything highway related.

      If this were not the case, and all else being equal many rural towns would go under. Private transportation is currently being subsidized at rates sometimes much higher than the property tax income the towns bring in. It’s unsustainable and barely working like everything else, it’s like long term vision is irrelevant and only short term gains are even considered…