• Naich@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m not sure how useful it is to make comparisons like this anyway. Drivers and cyclists break different laws, some of which are more dangerous than others. Speeding and close passes in vehicles are far more dangerous than cyclists going on a red-that’s-about-to-change where they can see that there’s nothing coming.

    • errer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      What I find weird is why do cyclists break the law the same amount when they have so much more to lose? I run a red in my car, another car hits me, maybe a minor injury but I likely walk away. I run a red on my bike, a car hits me, I’m fucking dead or at least laid out. As a biker you have more incentive to obey every law all the time.

      • MicrowavedTea@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        If the infrastructure/driving conditions are bad enough you run almost the same danger when driving lawfully. Eventually you learn to trust your senses more than traffic laws. Sometimes it’s actually safer to break some laws as a pedestrian/cyclist. Maybe people who ride a lot get used to it eventually and don’t see running a red light (when no cars are passing) as more dangerous than going on green.

      • Naich@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        It’s cars that cause injuries, not red lights. If you can see there are no cars coming and the light is red, it’s safer than going on green and just assuming that all the cars stop at their red. On a bike the main thing protecting you from injury is situational awareness. Traffic laws are a distant second.