• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    The only two there that bother me are the affiliate code thing (reminds me of the Honey drama) and installing extra software without consent. The first was a bad call and probably related with how their ad replacement stuff works (if anything, they should merely axe affiliate links; Firefox has that as an option), and this"solution" to the latter is pretty odd to me:

    reinstall the browser without admin rights

    Why would a browser need admin rights in the first place? I haven’t used Windows in well over a decade, so I don’t think that particular one would be an issue for me.

    The rest can be grouped as:

    • bugs - bug fixes generally don’t get prioritized until enough users complain; I would be very picky if I was an at risk person (activist or whatever) and would probably only use Tor browser
    • opt-in services
    • their marketing department

    My options for chromium browsers are:

    • something with ineffective ad blocking
    • Opera - I used it before it became a chromium browser, then it went downhill; not FOSS
    • Brave, with all its warts

    Since ad blocking and FOSS are my prerequisites, Brave basically wins by default.

    • Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Just block with unlock 🙉 why choose browser based on a ad block feature that is worse (injecting own ads/adware and therefore trying to dictate who is allowed to grab your attention) than the ad blocking extension?

      I recommend Firefox, due to best compatibility with uBlock (fuck manifest v3) and additionally have a DNS filter in your network, like pihole or adguard.

      On the go, use wireguard VPN to always be digitally home, and get your ads blocked (as well as tracking organisations) like that.