Users from 4chan claim to have discovered an exposed database hosted on Google’s mobile app development platform, Firebase, belonging to the newly popular women’s dating safety app Tea. Users say they are rifling through peoples’ personal data and selfies uploaded to the app, and then posting that data online, according to screenshots, 4chan posts, and code reviewed by 404 Media.

  • dandelion (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    The app enables the photos to be run through a reverse image search, enabling them to run a basic background check, check against public sex offender databases, and check for photos that might get flagged as being used in “catfishing” — misrepresenting one’s identity online.

    The app also features a “Tea Party Group Chat,” which allows users to directly share information about men, and has a rating function, which allows users to share their experiences with Yelp-style reviews, awarding men a “green flag” or a “red flag.”

    https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/25/us/tea-app-dating-privacy-cec

    It’s a bit like Rate My Professor, but for dating.

    Honestly I cyncially expect this kind of app might inevitably exist for rating people of all genders (or that dating apps might incorporate this Uber-style rating system), but the reason this app exists has directly to do with the violence women face from intimate partners.

    The point is that men who are enjoying the doxxing of women who have used this app are ignoring the context, or even have a warped sense of the context, as if this is narrowly about (legitimate) privacy concerns and the harms caused by the app.

    Even if the concerns about the app are justified, the revenge enjoyment betrays a view much harder to defend, that all the women who used the app are equally cupable, or that doxxing women using the app is equivalent to women doxxing abusive men through the app.

    Men are not all equally privileged, but there is a broad inequality both to how violence is distributed and how that plays out in dating situations. Women are not wrong to fear men. One in three women have experienced sexual or physical violence, most of that violence being perpetuated by men.

    Since this is the context for the use of this app, it’s not neutral to doxx its users or to claim it’s fair because men feel (legitimate) concerns about the app’s privacy violations.

    • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I agree 100% that women face many more dangers especially in the dating scene than men. I’m all for having resources available for them to remain as safe as possible.

      I don’t see how a Rate My Professor type app would work well for dates. I feel like people would only spend the time to rate poor dates. If you had a really good date with someone, you would presumably start dating them so why would you let everyone else know they are a good person to go out with? I have no doubt there are some awful people out there that others should be warned about, but this type of app is a bit too risky to justify that in my opinion.

      The background check feature sounds much more legit, but I don’t think a group chat feature needs to exist along side it.

      All that being said, anyone enjoying the doxxing of others is just an asshole. There’s definitely nothing fair about it from either side.

      • dandelion (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        yeah, the app has obvious flaws, and the Rate My Professor style approach succeeds or fails depending on the quality of the users and moderators, and could easily be useless or become toxic - either way, I’m not defending this aspect of the app, it’s clearly problematic.

        Regardless I understand why women would want a resource like this, and that doesn’t seem true for those in the comments who see the doxxing as deserved for using this app.

        Nevermind the rest of the context, like 4chan being a bastion of right-wing, misogynist trolls who would target an app like this for political reasons.

        Lemmy users approving 4chan doxxing women is a major red flag … it might have something to do with how many Lemmy users come here due to being banned for their behavior on Reddit. Reddit isn’t sending their best and brightest, and it shows. (This is just my speculation, though.)

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          There is absolutely no problem checking out a perspective date for criminal records or if they’re on the sex offenders register. But they don’t need an app to do that they can just reverse image search on Google themselves.

          The app added that to give legitimacy to its gossip feature. If lots of women have been on a date with the same guy and all have a story to tell that story is going to get told regardless of whether there’s an app enabling it or not.

          Men not being able to even view the content on the platform and see if anybody is posting about them is an inherent problem with the fundamental design of the app.