fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agoWater Snekmander.xyzexternal-linkmessage-square112fedilinkarrow-up1633arrow-down14
arrow-up1629arrow-down1external-linkWater Snekmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square112fedilink
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·1 day agoNo, there were probably waves.
minus-squareCodpiece@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·1 day ago+1 for pedantry. I’ve edited my comment to add an Oxford comma, because I know everyone likes those.
minus-squareteft@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·edit-21 day agoThat’s not an Oxford comma. Oxford commas (also known as serial commas) are for lists that contain more than three terms. You should just replace the “and waves” with “but there are waves” or something like that.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 day agoNow it’s worse. “Waves and no road” is what you’re looking for.
No, there were probably waves.
+1 for pedantry.
I’ve edited my comment to add an Oxford comma, because I know everyone likes those.
That’s not an Oxford comma. Oxford commas (also known as serial commas) are for lists that contain more than three terms.
You should just replace the “and waves” with “but there are waves” or something like that.
“waves and no road”
Now it’s worse.
“Waves and no road” is what you’re looking for.