And you give away your ideology with this comment. You are the extreme they are talking about.
“The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command”
1984
You reject this paper solely because it might go against your own beliefs. You don’t need to agree with every thing everyone publishes. It is important to keep your mind open instead of taking anything that might make your question your beliefs as a personal attack. Stop with the us vs them and start thinking for yourself.
most of the ukranians in crimea still live there after the almost bloodless coup. don’t tell me you haven’t thought this through. the irish must be huffing too much amazon money. how is it putting one foot in front of another? we call it walking
Herzl admited that he wanted the palestinians out like i mentionned in other comment. You are a zionist if you believe that zionists has eternal right to the land because of a two year old kingdom
Today yes but before it creation no, because zionists was imigrants that wanted to force a state by ethenically cleansing local population. It’s still ok to believe in a one state with equal right too
Zionists do not support it , they always refused to give back all the land that was occupied by israel in 67 those land are palestinians under international law and do not support a one state solution either that would allow israeli and palestinian in the whole land of mandate palestine and live together with equal rights
How do you know it is most of the time and not just sometimes? It’s like saying science often used for bad things like some racists was trying to use science to proof that white people are superior
The authors give away their ideology when they conflate anti-Zionism with anti-semitism.
If you think Zionism is a good thing, you’re supporting genocide.
Where do they conflate it? Here’s an excerpt from the quote they provide as an example of antisemitism:
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
And you give away your ideology with this comment. You are the extreme they are talking about.
“The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command”
You reject this paper solely because it might go against your own beliefs. You don’t need to agree with every thing everyone publishes. It is important to keep your mind open instead of taking anything that might make your question your beliefs as a personal attack. Stop with the us vs them and start thinking for yourself.
You would a reject an article from an pro russian media too
Removed by mod
Ireland is trying to redefine “genocide” to include Gaza & Ukraine situations.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce48wpd08pgo
“Redefine” when it’s calling it what it is.
Fuck off.
most of the ukranians in crimea still live there after the almost bloodless coup. don’t tell me you haven’t thought this through. the irish must be huffing too much amazon money. how is it putting one foot in front of another? we call it walking
It didn’t redefine anything. Yes both are genocides based on the legal definition
You are a zionist if you support a two-state solution.
What a bunch of bs
How so?
Herzl admited that he wanted the palestinians out like i mentionned in other comment. You are a zionist if you believe that zionists has eternal right to the land because of a two year old kingdom
I don’t think that. But I do think Israel has a right to exist.
Today yes but before it creation no, because zionists was imigrants that wanted to force a state by ethenically cleansing local population. It’s still ok to believe in a one state with equal right too
Does palestine has a right to exists too?
Yes
Zionists do not support it , they always refused to give back all the land that was occupied by israel in 67 those land are palestinians under international law and do not support a one state solution either that would allow israeli and palestinian in the whole land of mandate palestine and live together with equal rights
Technically true. I am therefore a Zionist. That doesn’t mean I want to see Israel expand into Jordan or even expand settlements in the WB.
You are no zionist if you oppose settlements in west bank because zionists believe any part of old jewish kingdoms belong to them
Me neither
But too often is zionist used as a dog whistle for jew.
It is scary that we have made humans into political topics.
Always have been
Removed by mod
keep em coming yank, every alt you make just grows the community numbers
Removed by mod
lol you called yourself a bot
How do you know it is most of the time and not just sometimes? It’s like saying science often used for bad things like some racists was trying to use science to proof that white people are superior
Most of the time it’s pointing out dog whistles and common slogans antisemites use to identify one another while also radicalising “normies”
It’s difficult
Stilñ waiting for evidence about it being most of the time rather thsn sometimes
Okay, sure. So, an example is the red arrow; you’ve probably seen some Twitter users or Hexbear users have the red arrow when referring to zionists.
This red arrow is a reference to Hamas propaganda videos, which in of itself is a reference to the Holocaust A “normie” would never know this, but extremists and antisemites can use it to identify one another while handwaving those who point out the dog whistle, ‘Oh, it’s just an arrow, don’t be so paranoid.’
Tsnkies are not the whole world show me surveys