It does seem a bit strange that it’s taken basically as a given that accidentally stumbling upon a picture of people not wearing stuff that didn’t even exist when the species evolved will do some sort of inevitable psychological harm to a kid. Intentional exposure sure, that’s about as sus as it gets, but that’s not what the kid finding something not aimed towards kids entails anyway.
Children don’t need to be protected from nudity, it’s a ridiculous and frankly harmful idea that they do.
It does seem a bit strange that it’s taken basically as a given that accidentally stumbling upon a picture of people not wearing stuff that didn’t even exist when the species evolved will do some sort of inevitable psychological harm to a kid. Intentional exposure sure, that’s about as sus as it gets, but that’s not what the kid finding something not aimed towards kids entails anyway.
Only the US takes it this way. And Iran. And Taliban Afghanistan.