The “specs”

Video: 720p,x264

  • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    10 days ago

    People on the third world with crappy connections and small screens. Was there, did that. (Still in the third world, but my connection is fine now and the screen is a TV)

  • Enjoyer_of_Games [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    10 days ago

    DVDs are 480p. For many people in the world this is a step up from the quality than they are used to.

    VHS beat betamax because for most people the cost and availability of movies was more important than the picture quality and these harsh trade offs are still very real in some places.

    • dead [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Bit starving a 720p resolution video will look worse than a 480p video with reasonable bitrate. DVDs use the MPEG-2 video codec and have a file size of 9 GB typically. Not many retail DVDs are sold on the 4.5G size.

      A good DVDrip, transcoding the the MPEG-2 video to x264, will usually have a file size of 1.5GB - 2GB for a full length movie.

      e///

      I want to add some math. If you do a web search for 480p x264 recommended bitrate, several video editing forums will tell you that 480p x264 will have a bitrate between 1000kbps to 2500 kbps. DVDs commonly come with an audio track which is AC-3 5.1 at 448 kbps. It is considered bad to re-encode lossy audio, so this doesn’t get changed. So we add the video bitrate + the audio bitrate to determine our estimated file size. Let’s say that a film is 90 minutes.

      low bit rate 480p example:
      (90minutes * 60seconds * (1000video + 448audio) ) / 8bits = 997400kilobytes =~974 mb

      high bit rate 480p example:
      (90minutes * 60seconds * (2500video + 448audio) ) / 8bits = 1989900kilobytes = ~1.9 gb

      • Enjoyer_of_Games [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 days ago

        I spent the better part of a decade watching 700mb divx rips. I know the quality sucks but again the point is that people can and will tolerate bad picture quality when there are other considerations to factor.

      • Majestic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        DVDs use the MPEG-2 video codec

        correct.

        and have a file size of 9 GB typically

        Incorrect.

        Though there exist dual layer or DVD9 commercial releases they were usually either double features like 2 movies on a disk or 4 TV episodes or uncommonly long films (Lord of the Rings for example).

        MOST commercially released DVDs were DVD5 or about 4.7GB in size. And this is based on oh 20 years of sample size.

        On DVD encoding: Things get tricky in comparisons because AVC introduced a lot of tricks to get lower bitrates while maintaining a certain psycho-visual level of passing image quality that MPEG2/4 simply didn’t have. It may not pass detailed frame by frame study of corner elements but for most people without perceptible quality loss you can knock the bitrate down meaningfully beyond the pure compression efficiency improvements of the follow-on codecs.

        • dead [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Most commercial film DVDs that I have seen are on DVD9. So much so that software exists such as “DVDShrink” so that pirates could compress DVD9 movies to a 4.5GB DVD-R disk.

          I’m not sure what data you are looking at to think that most DVDs are sold at DVD5. I know for a fact that your statement about DVD9 only being used in special cases is not true. I’ve seen communities that specialize in sharing raw DVD disc images and I am certain that DVD9 images exist for almost every movie.

  • DrMartinu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 days ago

    I’ve seen 400-500mb 720p x265s that are…decent. but nah, this says 264. Ain’t no way id touch that. Is half the movie a black screen?

  • Feinsteins_Ghost@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 days ago

    mobile is only thing i can think of. webrip is copy of a stream so the streamer is looking to make it as small as possible already. then its reencoded. and made even smaller and even shittier. small file size for places/people w limited data available. only has to look so good too, because yure looking at a mobile screen.

  • billgamesh [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 days ago

    I don’t own a TV. If I’m wanting a movie, i’m gonna watch it on a shitty screen with shitty speakers. i’d rather have it be quick and not take up too much space on my small hard drive

  • Lemmygradwontallowme [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Smh they should really keep up with the times…

    if you rlly need it, make a tankie.tube account, go to video making section, with the publish section, and you will find ‘upload a file’ ‘import with url’ or ‘torrent’

    Now ignoring torrent or even upload file, import with url is very easy

    Say for example, All the Devils Are Here from British movies on ok.ru

    In fact, I’ll make one public for you and send it (ok, now pardon me for my rudeness).

    And with captions from opensubtitles or any other site.

  • BigWeed [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 days ago

    Back in the day you could get a reasonably good rip for ~350mb. All the 2 pass encodings and max compression. There were barely any keyframes and it’d go all crazy sometimes, but it worked.