Reddit CEO Steve Huffman is standing by Reddit’s decision to block companies from scraping the site without an AI agreement.

Last week, 404 Media noticed that search engines that weren’t Google were no longer listing recent Reddit posts in results. This was because Reddit updated its Robots Exclusion Protocol (txt file) to block bots from scraping the site. The file reads: “Reddit believes in an open Internet, but not the misuse of public content.” Since the news broke, OpenAI announced SearchGPT, which can show recent Reddit results.

The change came a year after Reddit began its efforts to stop free scraping, which Huffman initially framed as an attempt to stop AI companies from making money off of Reddit content for free. This endeavor also led Reddit to begin charging for API access (the high pricing led to many third-party Reddit apps closing).

In an interview with The Verge today, Huffman stood by the changes that led to Google temporarily being the only search engine able to show recent discussions from Reddit. Reddit and Google signed an AI training deal in February said to be worth $60 million a year. It’s unclear how much Reddit’s OpenAI deal is worth.

Huffman said:

Without these agreements, we don’t have any say or knowledge of how our data is displayed and what it’s used for, which has put us in a position now of blocking folks who haven’t been willing to come to terms with how we’d like our data to be used or not used.

“[It’s been] a real pain in the ass to block these companies,” Huffman told The Verge.

  • finley@lemm.eeEnglish
    52·
    4 months ago

    You’re ignoring the idea that they could still be working on a way to restore content and haven’t completed that process yet

    there’s no evidence to suggest this, though.

    • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pubEnglish
      32·
      4 months ago

      Content is absolutely archived and they have financial incentive to restore the quality of their “knowledge base”

      That’s a fair amount of circumstance and motivation to support my idea, regardless of tangible evidence

      • finley@lemm.eeEnglish
        11·
        4 months ago

        Motivation and circumstance, absent actual evidence, does not make for a convincing argument.

          • finley@lemm.eeEnglish
            11·
            3 months ago

            No, it just means that they are no more than ideas at this point

            • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pubEnglish
              2·
              3 months ago

              Right, which means it can be fairly considered when discussing the real crux of the issue with AI and big tech companies right now, which is the monetization of other peoples content.

              If we’re discussing this, we should be looking at whether or not companies are doing this, given they have motive and specific, relevant circumstance to enact such behavior.

              Lack of evidence means you need to investigate for said evidence. It does not mean you should not investigate. Privacy advocates, members of any org/cert with an ethics statement should be blowing the whistle on any kind of activity that would mean a users data is not being deleted upon their request, especially considering reddits global usage.

              • finley@lemm.eeEnglish
                12·
                3 months ago

                By all means investigate, I’m just saying there has yet to be presented any actual evidence. I look forward to seeing whatever you may discover.