fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agoJust one more square bromander.xyzimagemessage-square29linkfedilinkarrow-up133arrow-down11
arrow-up132arrow-down1imageJust one more square bromander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square29linkfedilink
minus-squarelumpenproletariat@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoHow inefficient, I could fit 100 squares in there easily.
minus-squareDeconceptualist@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 months agoRight? Wake me up when we reach a 7 nm lithographic waffle process.
minus-squareLodespawn@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoOnly 100? Pathetic, with my improved algorithm I could get at least 121 squares.
minus-squareMinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoPsh I could fit like 1 square in there. Tryhards
minus-squarepotoo22@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoYeah, but you still have 4 edges in a circle. Just make a circle in the circle. Now you basically have an edible plate.
minus-squareMinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoLike what, a platewaffle? Are you some kind of breakfast wizard?
How inefficient, I could fit 100 squares in there easily.
Right? Wake me up when we reach a 7 nm lithographic waffle process.
Only 100? Pathetic, with my improved algorithm I could get at least 121 squares.
Psh I could fit like 1 square in there. Tryhards
Yeah, but you still have 4 edges in a circle. Just make a circle in the circle. Now you basically have an edible plate.
Like what, a platewaffle? Are you some kind of breakfast wizard?