• Michal@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    You’re assuming that in 1 you own the property and in 2nd you’re renting. A strawman argument if I ever saw one.

    • UmeU@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Most single family homes are owner-occupied. Most apartments are not.

    • scholar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      Even if you own your apartment in 2, you still likely don’t own the building

      • Michal@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        You don’t have to own the building. It’s not like a trailer park where you have to lease the land. You pay management fees for upkeep and you get a say in how you want the building managed.

        • VolumetricShitCompressor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          Deutsch
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s where then fun starts. You “own” your apartment but can’t do shit without approval by 20 nimbys. Also you pay into a HOA fund for general stuff.

          Owning apartments is the worst of both worlds. Get a huge loan just and still don’t get to do with your property what you want. It’s “property” commodified and enshittyficated. But what can one do these days? Buy a house? hahahahaha.