• A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    capitalism is compatible with democracy

    How did the “market of ideas” work prior to the internet?

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      To be fair, it never worked. Debate-as-bloodsport is largely a bourgeois way of viewing ideological conflict. Leftist pedagogy is more collective than classic models. The idea of a “marketplace of ideas” assumes that logical victors of an argument survive, but instead people license themselves into agreeing with that which they believe benefits them. The ruling class further propogates ruling class ideology, and uses this idea of a “winners survive” debate market to legitimize the prevalence of bourgeois ideology as such due to logically surviving, even if it never did. The marketplace of ideas is a sham.

      • A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        i was gonna say that prior to the internet the ruling class had a monopoly on public opinion but that works too

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          They generally do still! The internet has given both alternate means of subverting and enforcing cultural hegemony. This struggle of underground vs. above-ground ideological conflict has historically unfolded in similar ways. We need to advance and understand how best to gain leverage, asserting proletarian ideology. Leftist pedagogy is understudied for how critical it is.