The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Gaming@lemmy.worldEnglish · 17 days agoThis seems like a bad long-term strategylemmy.worldimagemessage-square85linkfedilinkarrow-up11.34Karrow-down13
arrow-up11.34Karrow-down1imageThis seems like a bad long-term strategylemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Gaming@lemmy.worldEnglish · 17 days agomessage-square85linkfedilink
minus-squareliking625@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up45·17 days agoOnly a single rule is needed. If mass layoffs need to happen, the top person responsible, the CEO, must also leave the company in the same fashion.
minus-squarefeannag@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up45·17 days agoWithout a golden parachute.
minus-squarecosmos8188@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·17 days ago…B…b.ut the yacht can stay. Right?? Some bilionare
minus-squarekablez@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22arrow-down1·17 days agoWhat about a trial by combat clause? CEO has to fight one representative of the workforce. In America this could be a whole new genre of reality tv! We could call it… Luigi’s Mansion.
Only a single rule is needed. If mass layoffs need to happen, the top person responsible, the CEO, must also leave the company in the same fashion.
Without a golden parachute.
…B…b.ut the yacht can stay. Right??
What about a trial by combat clause? CEO has to fight one representative of the workforce. In America this could be a whole new genre of reality tv! We could call it… Luigi’s Mansion.