RobotToaster@mander.xyz to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 months agoUK cinemas look at banning Meta smart glasses over piracy fearswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square29linkfedilinkarrow-up1181arrow-down12cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1179arrow-down1external-linkUK cinemas look at banning Meta smart glasses over piracy fearswww.theguardian.comRobotToaster@mander.xyz to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square29linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squarejumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·2 months agothe display is much more expensive than the camera so if there is any utility in there being a camer there is no reason to not have it
minus-squareWhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agooh lol. there’s a lot of reason. It’s called privacy. we shouldn’t stop there though, we need to get “laws” on that list too.
the display is much more expensive than the camera so if there is any utility in there being a camer there is no reason to not have it
oh lol. there’s a lot of reason. It’s called privacy. we shouldn’t stop there though, we need to get “laws” on that list too.