• starblursd@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    It doesn’t claim that they didn’t get consent… They didn’t… That’s what opt-out systems are, and it’s disgusting

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      3 days ago

      The opt-out is new but the platform definitely trained models on stream footage for years before telling anyone or giving them a way to opt-out.

      • starblursd@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Oh 100% I don’t think they are stopping because you hit opt out either… feel good button at best

        • x00z@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          And don’t forget the “it seems there was a bug!” response when they get caught.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        And the terms of service almost certainly allowed them to do that. I can’t imagine they have a case here.

        • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          3 days ago

          In a sane country, a terms of service doesn’t waive your rights to your legal minimum protections including privacy rights. In USA, I’m not so sure.

          • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            It usually doesn’t, but also you have to take entities to court to test that. Most people don’t bother (yay capitalism! Where you can do openly illegal shit so long as no one can afford to tell you no!)