SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Anti Meme@sopuli.xyz · 11 months agoHowwww??lemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square1linkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageHowwww??lemmy.dbzer0.comSnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Anti Meme@sopuli.xyz · 11 months agomessage-square1linkfedilink
minus-squareCatt (she/her)@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoThat one is quite simple. On the sketch, you get w+x+y+z=360º Making the substitution with x+y=w+z, you get w+w+z+z=360º <=> 2(w+z)=360º <=> w+z=180º Proving AOB is a line, because the sketch provides, that w+z is an angle of AOB. I am pretty sure, you were not asking for the proof, but I wanted to do it anyways. Does a genuine proof count as an anti meme?
That one is quite simple. On the sketch, you get
w+x+y+z=360º
Making the substitution with x+y=w+z, you get
w+w+z+z=360º <=> 2(w+z)=360º <=> w+z=180º
Proving AOB is a line, because the sketch provides, that w+z is an angle of AOB.
I am pretty sure, you were not asking for the proof, but I wanted to do it anyways. Does a genuine proof count as an anti meme?