In 2002, Yates was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to life in prison after she drowned her five children in a bathtub while her husband was at work in June 2001. Her children ranged in age from 6 months to 7 years old. She was later found not guilty by reason of insanity during a retrial, and committed to a state psychiatric hospital.
A CNN headline from March 2002 read, “Psychiatrist: Yates could have made herself better.” In a college student opinion column from February 2002, The State Press columnist Rob Jones wrote, “If it were up to many people, there would be no trial, only an execution.” Some columns from that time showed more nuance or even compassion, including an opinion piece published by The Washington Post in February 2002. In that piece, political columnist Richard Cohen wrote, “Why not treat this tragedy for what it is – the act of a sick woman?”
Now, the world is awaiting Clancy’s fate − but with “definitely more empathy this time, and looking at a broken system,” Vaeth said. The mother from Massachusetts faces three murder charges for strangling 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson and 8-month-old Callan in January 2023. While prosecutors say Clancy planned the killings − and Clancy does not dispute that she killed her children − Clancy’s defense attorney Kevin Reddington says she is not guilty because she, like Yates, was suffering from postpartum psychosis.
…
“This is not the first, this will not be the last, unfortunately, parent who is experiencing psychosis,” Hanna said. “These people who are stepping up and speaking up are saying, ‘Hello? I’m over here. Yep, I’ve actually had that, but not that. I had something, and I didn’t know what it was, and no one heard me or listened.’”



The state will happily gun down anyone who shows signs of illness, pawns are discarded the second they cease to act as cogs in the machine of capitalism
What does this have to do with women’s health and post partum psychosis?
seriously? the state controls women’s healthcare. capitalism is the taproot of state oppression. they are inextricably linked. all healthcare is state controlled. im surprised at this question here. it smacks of bad-faith time wasting.
The comment isn’t furthering discussion on the topic though. Are they implying that women like Andrea Yates are going to be gunned down? That’s not what’s happening here in Yates or Clancy’s situations.
you asked and got an answer that is sufficient. if that is your read on this then I withdraw. this is giving debate me bro vibes. i don’t argue with willful ignorance. its on you to resolve. fin.
Asking 1 clarifying question is being a “debate bro” now?
I know they’re linked, but why bring it up on this particular post? You can’t answer that?
you are not entitled to my time or energy. your pursuit of interaction after I withdrew proves my point about the vibes. i double dog dare you to refrain from responding again. i bet 5 bucks you struggle to do this. the point is not the post anymore… the horse is dead now. bye?
Well aren’t you pleasant lol