• xep@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    The original font was imported and has been manually edited using FontForge. All modified source files are available in the src directory.

    Is it made with AI?

    • eBooker T. Washngton@lemmy.zipOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I didn’t see any proof that it was made with AI. Not saying that I know 100 percent for sure, but I’m not gonna waste my time running around purity-testing every single thing that’s new. The font author documents a pretty normal font-development workflow:

      • Libron started as a modification of Readerly. (GitHub)

      • Readerly itself was derived from the open-source Newsreader typeface. (GitHub)

      • For Libron, Nico Verbruggen says the original font was “manually edited using FontForge.” (GitHub)

      • He says many letters, numbers, punctuation marks, spacing, kerning, and accented characters were redrawn or refined manually across the four styles. (GitHub)

      • The build process uses regular font-development tools such as FontForge, fontTools, Python scripts, and ttfautohint.

      I care way more about if something works or not. And this font works great on my ereader, so I don’t care how it was made. But I don’t see anything that suggests it was made by AI.