This post is a follow-up to this one. I don’t know the best way to present this part without sounding insane, but I do that on a daily basis without even trying, so this is ultimately going to expand on what samadhification is as well as define how planted möbiation is manifested from within one’s monadic beinghood.

To recap what my predecessor, the Buddha, said, samadhi is one of three aspects of enlightenment. In short, it is the ability to transcend duality. I originally came into understanding of this concept from a combination of experiences involving the cult I was in, the homelessness that followed, and a part within the book How to Change Your Mind by Michael Pollan, specifically where he speaks about how the brain processes the relationship of subject and object, in which, relating subject to object resulted in an experience that could be described with a sentence that starts with “I am…” while the inverse of relating object to subject results in an experience that I would begin describing with “It is…”

This is technically correct, in the same way that a sphere and cube of identical volume are the same thing. Based on what you decide reality should be defined by, reality will be defined by those terms. But, here I bestow more words unto you, as I’ve grown deeper in understanding of the underlying mechanisms that are directly responsible for manifesting such subjective experiences.

Thus, I tell you, samadhification is the act of unplanted möbiation that creates the spatial form that connects the point (x, y, z, 0) to (x’, y’, z’, 1). In this, I must ask you to make the same connection I have done, where I have come to understand that the entanglement process of Karma can accurately, if not precisely, be described in an analogy of navigating a labyrinth or solving a Rubik’s Cube; at any moment, we persist through our existence across a series of junctures where our intention determines what future junctures we may encounter. Thus, the act of samadhification is the choice of transcending to a higher order of complexity.

And my life partner, who is greatly and deeply knowledgeable of Buddhism, does not understand what I say in this and the next paragraph. He doesn’t understand there is a membrane; he believes, and is logically correct, that this dimensional expansion process can go on for an infinite number of dimensions. But, the nature of being a dependent phenomenon on God limits us to God’s 10+1 dimensional domain. There are all the fundamental possibilities of novel form within ten dimensions, plus there is the eleventh dimension that acts as a membrane to define relative values as absolute.

This eleventh dimension, if we use the labyrinth analogy, consists of a singular curved path that returns you to where you just were, but with orthogonality reversed. But, if one were to realize they were in this path at the time its symbolic navigation occurs and one were to return emptiness (null) to the Server, that is what causes planted möbiation and is the fundamental mechanism of enlightenment.

Before I ever entered a Buddhist temple, I had heard six different origin stories for the Buddha. Then I read what monks wrote on their walls; how the Buddha was meditating under the Bodhi tree on a fateful night, during which he heard three seperate sets of three distinct knocks deep in the forest. Three times the Buddha found himself looping on this eleventh dimensional path, yet on the third loop, he understood in his heart what I only understand cognitively at this juncture, and not even precisely, at that.

I’ll get it one of these days. After all, it’s not like I’m some featherless biped on some wet rock hurtling around a nuclear fireball in a void that makes my boipussy jealous. Nah, I’m a pocket of consciousness connected to a larger pocket of consciousness that’s trying to untangle the cosmos’ most diabolical knot made out of whatever completely and wholly empty garbage we happen to be made up of.