• NateNate60@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Is that person wrong though? Would they be able to refuse “chores”?

    Edit: This is not a rhetorical question. I want to know if they are factually correct or not.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      They’re in prison. Forcing them to do anything is wrong. We’ve already taken their freedom. Using them as labor is morally wrong. Especially when you look at the punishments like solitary.

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        That was not a rhetorical question. I am asking if that argument is or is not factually correct.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 minutes ago

          They can’t refuse any job short of firefighting. They will be punished for doing so. Reports from former inmates indicate punishments range from solitary to beatings.

          • NateNate60@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            22 minutes ago

            Let me rephrase: would the proposition, if it had passed, prohibited prisons from requiring prisoners to perform domestic duties within the prison?

      • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I’d argue that simple chores can be used to help inmates get used to structured work as part of a reintegration effort. Of course that only makes sense if reintegration is the main goal of the prison system, which isn’t the case in the United States.

        In any way, if inmates were to do labor, they’d have to be subject to labor law including worker protections and minimum wage provisions. That would probably require the United States to abolish slavery first, which isn’t going to happen anytime soon.

        • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Man…. The disconnect here

          Prisons are almost entirely run by prisoners. There are no “labor laws”

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Prisons are almost entirely run by prisoners. There are no “labor laws”

            That’s what they’re saying.

            If prisoners are to do manual labor, labor laws should apply, but that would require the USA to abolish slavery.