• tiramichu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Helmets are important. But I do wonder if this approach is going to lead to unjustified anger and violence against filling station employees simply for complying with the law and refusing fuel (as if it’s even their choice)

    • brewery@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Im curious about your argument because this would justify not putting any rules at any time. No cigarettes for under age in shops (might attack a shop keeper), no alcohol in pubs (might attack a bartender), no fines for speeding (might attack cameras or police), no parking restrictions (might attack ticket wardens), etc.

      Maybe the threat of fines are not enough to change this behaviour (which I can understand in India after spending a lot of time there) so they are trying a novel approach. One thing Indian police will take more seriously is attacking a worker for applying the rules compared to risking your own life.

      • tiramichu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I am overall in favour of the new rules being applied. I think the change is good, and this manner of enforcing it should save a lot of lives.

        Despite being in favour I still wanted to raise that potential consequence - that some blameless worker is pretty certainly going to get assaulted over this by some angry idiot.

        • brewery@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Oh Ok. Sorry, it just can’t across really negative rather than pointing out a potential flaw. I can see difficulties enforcing it by the workers like you mention