dadarobot@lemmy.sdf.org to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agoRulelemmy.sdf.orgimagemessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up1221arrow-down10
arrow-up1221arrow-down1imageRulelemmy.sdf.orgdadarobot@lemmy.sdf.org to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agomessage-square20fedilink
minus-squareLinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up22·1 year agoI know this isn’t true because we’re not called the United States of Funk
minus-squarepooberbee (they/she)@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 year agoIt is actually true, just the portrait they’ve chosen for the article is highly stylized and didn’t really look like him.
minus-squareLinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·edit-21 year ago“Highly stylized” as in “an entirely different person”
minus-squarepooberbee (they/she)@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 year agoWell not entirely different. They’re both named George.
minus-squareLinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoTrue. Someone needs to make a venn diagram
minus-squarepooberbee (they/she)@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoThey also both had sons named George.
I know this isn’t true because we’re not called the United States of Funk
It is actually true, just the portrait they’ve chosen for the article is highly stylized and didn’t really look like him.
“Highly stylized” as in “an entirely different person”
Well not entirely different. They’re both named George.
True. Someone needs to make a venn diagram
They also both had sons named George.