• 0 Posts
  • 15 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 3rd, 2023

help-circle

  • Cipher22@lemmy.worldtoFuck Cars@lemmy.worldDerby, CT road widening
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Only maybe, and assuming that the properties didn’t already belong to the city anyhow. Often a city will purchase property to be able to eat the costs for new businesses moving in. However, the back drop is empty, so this wasn’t a popular location. If the city couldn’t get someone to rent without modernization, then the result was fair for property that was likely built out of the way when the city was growing since op said they were a little older and the population was stagnate.

    I’m not arguing the road was a good call, I’m just saying keeping the buildings may not have been either. Another use would have been smarter, heck, even a solar farm given the open area to provide energy for the local community if the state government hasn’t banned it like some.


  • Cipher22@lemmy.worldtoFuck Cars@lemmy.worldDerby, CT road widening
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    It would been wonderful if they could’ve at least used the parking lot to host a farmers market.

    You’d be amazed on the cost to refurbish even moderately older buildings. The last time I was looking at one it was $3 million for the plumbing alone in one building from the 1940’s to be able to support CRAC units without risking soil in the lines.



  • Cipher22@lemmy.worldtoFuck Cars@lemmy.worldDerby, CT road widening
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Even completely blind guessing, over even a 5 year gap, I’ll bet the price of tearing them down was less than half the costs to the local community as keeping them and adding enough incentives to make businesses actually move in.

    They could’ve totally used the space differently after, but tearing down was very likely the smart call.

    If the road is a state route, the construction costs may even have been moved to the state tax budget and significantly save the local community money. The year on year costs wouldn’t even be a fair fight at that point. They may have even made the road expansion as an intentional call to leverage the state tax burden to alleviate local tax burdens. Not knowing the area, I’m not gonna judge the call.


  • Cipher22@lemmy.worldtoFuck Cars@lemmy.worldDerby, CT road widening
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    Old buildings like that can have massive maintenance, repair, and sustained costs while also being undesirable for businesses for a lack of modern infrastructure. Given the field behind them, these weren’t central to the town and likely a good call to tear down.

    How the space was used after that’s a different discussion.




  • Economy of scale matters, so does practicality. Which one is generally lasting longer per number of charges and what’s the long term viability of both given the time they were build and the available tech at that time? I totally understand the greater availability of sodium vs lithium. However, will it last? Last time I read much about it, reliability was weak, charge capacity over time dropped drastically, and failures were high. (It has been a couple of years, so things may be changing. )

    Something new and shiney can be nifty, but past that, what is this? It seems like an expensive hood ornament that will rust in the rain. Lithium is expensive and toxic to mine, but so are all metals to some extent, and this has plenty.

    It seems like it’s buying something 25% off on a $100 thing that won’t last well. Sure, you saved $25 once, but you’re buying 3 of them in the same time frame.