This is good actually, because it will reduce the brain drain of other countries. Critical support for JDPON Don.
This is good actually, because it will reduce the brain drain of other countries. Critical support for JDPON Don.
You still can’t rid of reverence of the past. USSR revered the Paris Commune, the Paris Commune revered the Jacobins, the Jacobins revered the Roman Republic and Ancient Athens.
Men make their own history, but they do not make it as they please; they do not make it under self-selected circumstances, but under circumstances existing already, given and transmitted from the past. The tradition of all dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brains of the living. And just as they seem to be occupied with revolutionizing themselves and things, creating something that did not exist before, precisely in such epochs of revolutionary crisis they anxiously conjure up the spirits of the past to their service, borrowing from them names, battle slogans, and costumes in order to present this new scene in world history in time-honored disguise and borrowed language. Thus Luther put on the mask of the Apostle Paul, the Revolution of 1789-1814 draped itself alternately in the guise of the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire, and the Revolution of 1848 knew nothing better to do than to parody, now 1789, now the revolutionary tradition of 1793-95.
It doesn’t actually matter, because both Ukraine and Russia have already been heavily mining the frontlines for 3 years already.
Thanks to these maniacs, Kim Jong Un now seems to be wisest person on the earth
The historical materialism is a pathway to many abilities some consider to be… unnatural.
Bears usually avoid humans, unless very hungry, because those who didn’t avoid us, didn’t tend to live very long.
Historically people were uneducated. Now they are mis-educated.
You are horrified at our intending to do away with private property. But in your existing society, private property is already done away with for nine-tenths of the population; its existence for the few is solely due to its non-existence in the hands of those nine-tenths. You reproach us, therefore, with intending to do away with a form of property, the necessary condition for whose existence is the non-existence of any property for the immense majority of society.
In one word, you reproach us with intending to do away with your property. Precisely so; that is just what we intend.
The truth is though that ultimately, politicians are gonna be malleable to those who are going to vote
No, they are not. A single donation from a billionaire would buy more press to get more voters from name recognition than a million working class supporters. And if the politician betrays his base, the most he can fear is losing reelection, and even this is not assured. If a politician goes against billionaires, he is going to be smeared, harassed and have his opposition funded. This ensures that the only politicians in any significant elections are already guaranteed to serve billionaires.
The first entry in the logs you assemble to discover the lead up to disaster:
Liberalism has always been about freedom for property owners.
Yeah, communists don’t like it, when you attack socialist states, and will strike back.
And after capitalism is over - it will be time for getting rid of the state, and what will be needed for it, will be seen at the time. Maybe it will wither away voluntarily, maybe it will be smashed in an another revolution.
The socialist state is a necessity to survive against capitalist onslaught, and wanting to dismantle it before capitalism is crushed is suicidal behaviour. How would anarchists deal with the Entente intervention or Nazi Germany or USA?
I would gladly switch to anarchism if your revolution manages to win instead of being crushed by capitalists.
Kronstadt
Non-authoritarianly licking the boots of Tsarist generals.
Thinking of politics in terms of good guys and bad guys is kindergarten-level.
This is literally Budenny.
This is until you do multivariate functions. Then you get for f(x(t), y(t)) this: df/dt = df/dx * dx/dt + df/dy * dy/dt