md5 for example is already vulnerable. People have figured out how to manipulate data into having a pre-specified hash. Meaning someone could engineer deliberate hash collisions and serve you any file they like.
SHA-256 doesn’t (i think) have this issue, so far hah.
you have to fucking hope no one figures out how to backwards engineer the hashing algorithm you choose
precisely, which is why they cannot lie, just respond with no real grasp of wether what they output is truth or falsehoods.
everything is semantics.
Lying is telling a falsehood intentionally
LLM’s clearly lack the prerequisite intentionality
not really no. They are statistical models that use heuristics to output what is most likely to follow the input you give it
They are in essence mimicking their training data
Spotify seem to confuse breaking the TOS with breaking the law.
I mean, junk food diets tend to be more calorie dense
I need to cut down on my internet consumption.
it wouldn’t be much of a joke if we didn’t pretend to take it seriously no?
While I don’t necessarily agree or disagree with the ban…
In what way is this a free speech ban?!
yuuup. https://youtu.be/0AFxchwHPKA
yet the universe is probably infinitely large, and expanding.
star,t stop and ok would be the same in swedish as in english
a decent sized server farm absolutely could raise indoor temperature
BA DUUUN, BA BA DUUUN, BA BA DUUUN
they’re off by a full century
not really, it’s short for washed-up, which has been in use for at least a century
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/washed-up
do you mean github or do you actually mean git?