

Things can have a bias and still be correct yes, but you have not provided a reason as to why your specific model is “correct”


Things can have a bias and still be correct yes, but you have not provided a reason as to why your specific model is “correct”


Lmao go off


Read what i wrote again. I never suggested communists were Nazis, and I don’t take issue with communists. I’m referring to the specific brand of “communism” you practice in the triad: campist pro-authoritarian pro-bureaucracy pro-massacre “communists”.
Your group and Nazis are similar in that you both preach nonsense


I wouldn’t want to see what nazis post. Similarly i don’t want to see what tankies post


Lmao. Say what you want but your tankie triad is an echo chamber. Banning anyone expressing a moderately different one from yours.


I already am?


Why don’t you stay in your echo chamber? Much better that way


Bruh get off my tail


Like i said if that’s how you want to do it, who am i to argue with you?
You’ve set the terms, and your classifications are internally consistent. All I’m highlighting is that it’s left-biased and therefore not objective


Your version is a left-focused/biased interpretation. The dictatorship of capital is not the only thing that makes a state authoritarian IMO.
Going by your classifications, the DPRK isn’t authoritarian, and that’s a ridiculous premise unless you’re a tankie.


Well i guess if that’s your version of this then so be it


What’s your deal man?


What are tankies doing in the bottom left?
Mastodon ❌
Bluesky ✅


dessalines
Not bro💀
It’s the Marxist communities that challenge the echo chamber.
And by so doing become echo chambers of their critiques. Anywhere on the internet that is saturated with those who think alike is an echo chamber.
As a side note, did you read Blackshirts and Reds?
I read a bit. I haven’t really been able to get through it cuz i have exams coming up. So i should get to it when those are over.


Willingness to engage outside the echo chamber and in good faith makes you better than them in my book


Nah bro you definitely also should give yourself some props. You’re probably the most ardent Marxist on the fediverse. Even though your contributions may not have reached the heights of db0’s you’re still quite influential in your sphere iykwim.
You’re the father of fediverse Marxism while db0 is the father of fediverse Anarchism.


The two juggernauts going head to head💀🙏
I’m taking issue with your narrow definition of authoritarian. I don’t support the premise that authoritarian governments can exist only through the dictatorship of capital.
If freedom of press, freedom of movement, etc are impeded, then there is no democracy. You’re an anarchist. You should agree with this