Yeah, not a meat.

Did you invade or destabilize a government?

Id argue the last few points.

• You can feed yourselves, but it won’t be meat.

• you do have the manpower.

Then why did they vote for Trump?

You know, the the one who’s actions and words nearly mirror the key architect of the main genocide people think off when it comes up.

NOTHING in Trumps policy, actions and concept-of-plan tells me Gaza would be any better off under him, and there are significant signs it will be worse, wider spread and include Ukraine, Taiwan and the US itself.

I usually like those.

Not that one though

At least climate we can do something about with wallets and choices - its not yet illegal.

How do you make a navy SEAL cry?

Tell him his book isn’t selling.

Heard a podcast episode from this girls mum. Fuckinf depressing reality.

Jump seat behind pilot for helicopters, I assume due to the supporting framework from the engines and not in blade range.

Middle of planes over the wing root - easy access to exits, crumple zone infront, not going with the tail if it hits, and strongest part of aircraft. Also right over a fuel tanks, so results vary.

I recently found out that paneer also works, at 1/4 the price, just needs a little salt.

I may have gone through a few 1kg blocks recently…

How many arms does Mrs. Squid have to do all that?

Each person capable of reading this post contributes above our earths carrying capacity and support fossil fuel exploitation, exploitative mining and environmental degradation just by owning electronic goods.

We are also well above where we should be. Billionaires use our lifetime of carbon emissions nearly daily, but we do the same compared to 3rd world countries we also dump our waste on.

You’re not wrong, but to be fair have you ever managed to persuade a billion odd people to have less for the betterment or the other 7 billion and themselves?

Its a very weird line.

Back in ww2 when the allies ran the bombing campaign of German cities the “justification” was that civilians were being used to manufacture arms for the armed forces therefore a part of the military logistics network, and in fairness yes they were - like the British were at the start.

On the other hand it is a deliberate attack on civilians who are not in uniform, not part of the armed forces and not combatants. You could quite easily follow this path to everyone who pays tax or trades with that country as supporting the war effort.

Going at it from a different direction, terrorism is defined as non state actor, using violence against civilians, for a political objective. Therefore terrorism.

Is it justified - probably not but neither is much of warfare. Proportional but didn’t minimize civilian casualties.

Is it terrorism - leaning towards yes.

He was in Iron Man 2.

He popped in to ruin that too.

Make no mistake, im not saying we should stop. Far from it. Only that we should have had these discussions 30 years ago, and don’t be soo quick to dismiss the next tragedy to focus on this one - we just repeat the cycle.

You’re right, the timeline is compressed from the 50 years we “thought” we had, down to literally months, and I don’t think people actually realise that. Too bad most targets are 2050, 2060…

Interestingly you’re both correct.

We swapped to ICE vehicles as they were cleaner than shit covered streets from all the horses, making a new problem.

Renewable energy is much cleaner long term- but what new issues are we not seeing? If we through ourselves head first into this (and we need to) what did we miss?

No, we would have an over capacity of shipping space, forcing the price down sharply. In the short term goods would be much cheaper to ship, reducing in a host of global economic changes- some good but alot not.

The ownership class is not physically capable of doubling our good production overnight to keep them running - long term though its quite probable. Ships will be refitted, a lot scrapped, new orders canceled- but it takes time.

And capitalism is absolutely driven by demand. Any organization that tries to tell people to buy something they aren’t interested in will fail. They can alter demand, and yes they control that, but it us demand driven.

While yes, fuck Russia Putin, if the drones were still up they were still technically armed and a combatant.

If they had surrendered, different story. But then again, if I surrendered and still carried my assault rifle have I surrendered?

I think the LOAC and geneva conventions, along with UN charter need to be updated for a modern world.

I didn’t mention Gaza, why is that your point?

So we should have a political system where the physically strongest get elected leader? Or would it be a elected position?

Current US election aside