

That’s an option but doesn’t seem realistic. If a service is freely available on the Internet, it’s hard to ban it in a specific country. China and Russia are doing it and that require massive Internet censorship apparatus, strict measures against VPN, Tor, and online privacy tools.
Blocking of piracy websites are a good example of a decision to block escalating to rediculous levels, and becoming increasingly problematic.
Companies from the from music/cultural industry convinced a court to order ISP to block some websites, and they did by meddling with their own DNS servers.
Then those companies came back to request blocking by alternative DNS providers such as Google and OpenDNS, since people used them to workaround blocks.
And next of course these companies attacked VPN providers, asking for more blocking, again because those allow working around previous blocks.
These ISP, DNS and VPN providers are third parties with no involvment in piracy, but they’re being forcully involed into that fight anyway. This is completely disproportionate. If they want to fight piracy those companies should only be allowed to attack those actually involved.
If they have their way, we’ll end up the having the equivalent of the great firewall of china dedicated to tracking and blocking anything remotely looking like piracy or p2p.