Might I suggest 1946: The Mistranslation That Shifted Culture

Technically there was mention about abusing children sexually as a sin, but they changed it to being gay is a sin. Saying the quiet part out loud.

I’m honestly not even sure what talk about the Epstein files is supposed to accomplish.

Establishing how disgusting it is to defend, hide or support the bad actors in those files…that’s what it is for. Every person named in those files could go away and you are still left with thousands who protected them from consequences and millions who turned a blind eye. This is one of those “never forget” things.

Meanwhile, MAGA voters are agreeing as well because they voted for “definitely won’t do a war, trust me” Donald cranky old fart Trump will upvote, though, also without reflecting on the irony.

After you remove all the C-suite salaries they only have 14 dollars left. Don’t you know that execs need their yachts?

I feel like utilizing eye tracking would be used if they were to study this concept more deeply. That data would be more complicated to sift through given how much data and how many variables might come into play. Definitely more telling but also harder to analyze.

I’m not buying that heatmap data.

In the article they note that they participants were shown photos and told to click on areas that caught their attention. The results show that women paid more attention to the periphery. No eye tracking, no long focus.

Yeah, the only thing missing from this article is that the title doesn’t end with “, as intended.”

No, common sense says that.

…yeah… that’s the point.

The absolute best the US should ever expect going forward is a zero trust transaction.

The idea that the corrupt conservative network that continues to empower Trump will collapse without him is laughable. These people aren’t beholden to that orange idiot. They will lose the person who brought them here but they have long been ensuring they won’t need him once he has gone. And those people aren’t nearly as inept as Trump.

Absolutely not because of privacy concerns. But definitely not about a resources or time issue. This is them responding to the negative backlash without acknowledging their tone deaf Superbowl ad. If there was time or resource issue they wouldn’t have dropped tens of millions of dollars bragging about it.

I prefer brown pants

What psychopath would try to lure pure, innocent and very important billionaires in the warzone that is California? Don’t they know we would be lost without their genius and greatness?..

Yes and please.

That position of privilege was something the US should have been removed from decades ago. It has nothing to do with the Trump. It has nothing to do with whether the US was responsible with the power they exert on the global landscape. No one country should be allowed or even try to lord over other countries.

And if a long-standing boycott of the US is what it takes to humble them… do it. Keep doing it. It is better for those boycotting, it is better for the world and it is better for the US too.

“Disc-uh, disco… they used a weapon, right Marco? Right… ah. I shouldn’t even talk… they tell me not to talk about it. But a very powerful weapon. A new weapon that no one knows about.”

I have always wanted to ask an ICE agent if they find it tiresome having to tuck their clown nose into their mask every day.

That’s why he wants Greenland.

This might by why someone within his regime wants Greenland, but Trump?.. No. I don’t think any reasoned conclusion matters in convincing Trump. It is entirely more likely Trump was convinced by things like “no other president could do it”, “we can name it Trumpland” or “it’s center is filled with cream”.

But… Republicans have worked so hard over decades to erode education to the point it benefits them… and you want to take that away? Maybe we should tariff YOU!