And Hatsune Miku (part of farfetch’d)

No, Brazil(ian) probably. Not Chad(ian).

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Both myself and that other person in this comment chain pretty much said things that agree with you. Think that other commenter was saying the same as well.

I was pointing out that it didn’t really make sense they were getting down voted for making the distinction climate != weather while still noting that yes, the climate is slowly getting hotter and we aren’t doing enough to fix it.

“It’s just weather cycles but we need to communicate climate reality more accurately.”

They’re not wrong though, and your graph supports that. Not sure if you’re stating one way or the other because this is just evidence which is often good.

I saw the other comment where you linked to this one that seems to imply they are wrong and a bunch of people are down voting for some reason too.

Some years will still be colder than the previous and specific regions will be warm/colder year over year as well.

Averages of course only show signs of going up. Hope we somehow remedy that but the outlook of course does not look good.

https://lemmy.nowsci.com/comment/4490200

This comment from another post of the same article has some good counter points on why this probably isn’t as bad as it sounds.

While ridiculous, there’s interesting context here.

Greenland has little to no economy

The ice is mined from ice that has already broken away from the glacier, thus not reducing any more than nature has already

Cargo ships bringing frozen food used to leave empty, now that same fuel is used to transport ice back instead of going to waste

The founder has always dreamed of a sustainable economy for Greenland

He is conflicted about how his work to do this in a sustainable way is being taken

The follow up comments are worth reading too.