A lot of crap products are at least decent enough to not have a half life.

Neural networks existed since the 1970s.

The problem is that code is hard to write. AI just doesn’t solve it. This is opposite of crypto, where the product is sort of good at what it does, (not bitcoin, though), but we don’t actually need to do that.

I just wanted to try and figure out whether the quality of Lutris had indeed declined as you said in your earlier comment. I’m not trying to get the game running, “Age of Wonders 4” is just the first title in my library.

Edit: But thanks anyway.

After reading your comment, I tried it for myself, running “Age Of Wonders 4” through Lutris 0.5.22. Nothing happened. As in, literally nothing, game didn’t launch, and no error. Then downgraded Lutris to 0.5.19, and first I got a message saying that wine needed to install something, and then I got an error message saying “A java script error occurred in the main process”.

So the results of my experiment are inconclusive. I consider an error message a better than result than nothing visibly happening, because an error message at least tells me nothing its not working, instead of letting me wait and wait.

So, yes, it appears that the quality of Lutris has declined after the developer started using Claude Code. However, my experiment was just a quick and dirty experiment, and ultimately further research is necessary.

I propose the following experiment, keep in mind that this is basically a rough sketch of the procedure:

1. Set up two virtual machines running linux, a and b. (TODO: Decide on distro)
2. Install Lutris 0.5.22 on a, and 0.5.19 on b.
3. Try out several games on both a and b, both installed and launched through lutris, and record how well they run.

True, but line isn’t going down yet.

Sort of yes, but also no. High tier LLM’s are all offered well below cost. So if the costs were to go up, a lot of current users would not be able to afford to run AI agents anymore.

Your[sic] not discussing anything honestly, your[sic] just derailing and trolling which is PR and Marketing[sic] firms 101 for comment farms and paid bots and it just so HAPPENS your[sic] following that pattern too[sic]. Must be a coincidence there as well.

Do I need to remind you that the title of this thread mentions the Rothschilds by name?

What did you have mind?

Between the new banking regulations, shell companies, trusts and attorney client privilege they can hide their true wealth and thats how the mega rich do that. Away of the eyes of the common persons ability to even know what’s up

So, basically, you don’t have any evidence. Weird how you keep obsessing about them. Why do they scare you so much?

Why do you even care enough to defend them right now?

You do realize that I’m calling them has-beens.

They are at the center of, or at least concerningly involved with, every major social upset in my country for the last 200 years.

Let me guess, no evidence for any of this?

Never heard anyone defend anyones honor like this without a heck of a reason.

I spent maybe 10 minutes on all my replies in this thread, total. Kinda reflects poorly on you that you consider this a monumental effort.

So let’s hear it or fuck off with what appears to be, at this point, disingenuous and half-assed commentary to derail the conversation away from that whole concept here

Talking about the Rothschilds in a discussion about the Rothschilds is “derailing”, apparently. Weird assessment.

I figure a ban of targeted advertisement would look like “The ads are only allowed to change once a day, and everybody during said day sees the same ads”. Whereas currently, each time you load a website, there’s an impromptu auction to sell the ad spots. (Advertisers don’t actually have to pay until you click their ad). So there would be less incentive to keep the user constantly engaged, as it would be enough if the user just visits regularly.

I’ve been trying to remember the name of this number. Thanks.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wealthiest_families

They don’t even make the list of the wealthiest families.

An article which clearly shows that their influence and cohesion has waned since 18th century.

Source?

The Rothschilds wealth did not consolidate.

In Florence. The Rothschields are from Austria.

Even if it’s actually the Rothschilds we’re talking about, that doesn’t mean these guys are from one of the branches of the family where the money is. The Rothschilds got rich in the 18th century, so that’s quite some time for wealth and influence to wane.

If you do the 1st one, then most companies likely wouldn’t bother with such algorithms anymore.