I only know the guy from the thumbnails and dead eyes. But this really feels like reaching for a justification to hate.
“I’m not educated on what the man has done, but I’m going to spout my uninformed opinion, anyway.”
all I’m saying is that without any context, these kind of statements are kinda cheap and meaningless.
Funny how the Internet is a tool to be able to look up the context in only a few minutes.
Barely. Give him another ten years to reach Musk or Zuckbot’s level.
I think this is a case of “Perfect is the enemy of good enough”.
Almost every single study I see has a sample size that is too damn small. It’s such a chronic problem.
Well, that sounds like the beginning of the end.
Well, I’m certainly glad there a nasal spray that deals with the toxic mice tangles in my nose.
Shitty sample sizes are the majority of “research” nowadays. It’s sad how hard it is to find any even in the triple digits.
Is that the video that uses a deceptive title on a different subject, only to rant about Tommy for the rest of the video for 3 hours?
And have it end up like Starbound? No way.
Every single office chair I buy for myself and my family is followed by an immediate purchase of rollerblade wheels for that chair. Standard office wheels suck, and replacing them is really easy. They glide so well.
Seriously. I want to play Alan Wake 2, but not if it’s on Epic’s store.
I don’t understand drunk hangovers.
Drink water. Then you don’t have hangovers. That’s it.